Cricket Reviews Youtube channel statistics
Date | Video views | Estimated earnings |
---|---|---|
25.03.2024 Mon | +13,438 | $ 5 - $ 30 |
21.03.2024 Thu | +14,467 | $ 5 - $ 32 |
18.03.2024 Mon | +25,690 | $ 9 - $ 57 |
14.03.2024 Thu | +38,087 | $ 14 - $ 85 |
10.03.2024 Sun | +31,329 | $ 11 - $ 70 |
07.03.2024 Thu | +64,112 | $ 24 - $ 144 |
04.03.2024 Mon | +98,140 | $ 36 - $ 220 |
29.02.2024 Thu | +62,836 | $ 23 - $ 141 |
26.02.2024 Mon | +97,934 | $ 36 - $ 220 |
23.02.2024 Fri | +222,245 | $ 83 - $ 500 |
14.02.2024 Wed | +114,335 | $ 42 - $ 257 |
10.02.2024 Sat | +186,240 | $ 69 - $ 419 |
05.02.2024 Mon | +59,150 | $ 22 - $ 133 |
01.02.2024 Thu | +157,258 | $ 58 - $ 353 |
Cricket Reviews biography
Cricket Reviews is a popular YouTube channel that primarily focuses on providing reviews of cricket matches. The channel was started by a group of passionate cricket fans who wanted to create a platform where they could share their insights and opinions about the game. Today, Cricket Reviews has become one of the most popular sports-related channels on YouTube, with millions of followers from all around the world. The channel primarily features match reviews, previews, and analysis, and is known for its in-depth and detailed coverage of international cricket tournaments. Cricket Reviews is also popular for its unique and engaging style of presenting cricket-related content, which has earned it a dedicated fan base.
Cricket Reviews controversies
Cricket Reviews has been involved in a few controversies over the years. The first one was in 2018 when the channel received negative feedback after posting a video that was deemed insensitive towards a particular cricket player. The video was taken down, and the channel issued an apology shortly after. The second controversy came in 2020 when Cricket Reviews was accused of biased reporting during a high-profile cricket match between two countries. The channel was criticized for its lack of objectivity and for promoting a particular team. Despite the backlash, Cricket Reviews continued to maintain its stance and defended its reporting as fair and impartial.