Share on
O Dia Online O Dia Online
Subscribers
90,200
Video views
52,541,009
Video count
3217
Country
Category
Youtuber since
2009
Share it, if you like it

O Dia Online Youtube channel statistics

O Dia Online
Subscribers
90,200
Video views
52,541,009
Video count
3217
Estimated earnings in past 30 days
$ 97 - $ 586
88
last 7 days
Subscribers
600
last 30 days
1,700
last 90 days
26,274
last 7 days
Video views
260,519
last 30 days
838,876
last 90 days
Date Video views Estimated earnings
17.04.2024 Wed +26,274 $ 9 - $ 59
14.04.2024 Sun +17,256 $ 6 - $ 38
09.04.2024 Tue +13,868 $ 5 - $ 31
04.04.2024 Thu +63,704 $ 23 - $ 143
31.03.2024 Sun +50,846 $ 19 - $ 114
27.03.2024 Wed +88,571 $ 33 - $ 199
23.03.2024 Sat +54,268 $ 20 - $ 122
19.03.2024 Tue +26,933 $ 10 - $ 60
15.03.2024 Fri +9,498 $ 3 - $ 21
12.03.2024 Tue +15,759 $ 5 - $ 35
08.03.2024 Fri +61,156 $ 22 - $ 137
05.03.2024 Tue +35,308 $ 13 - $ 79
02.03.2024 Sat +38,534 $ 14 - $ 86
27.02.2024 Tue +56,976 $ 21 - $ 128

O Dia Online biography

O Dia Online is a leading news website in Brazil that provides news, opinions, and analysis on various topics including politics, economics, sports, entertainment, and more. With a strong focus on delivering accurate and reliable information, O Dia Online has become a trusted source of news for millions of readers across Brazil. The website covers both national and international news, ensuring that its audience stays updated with the latest developments. O Dia Online's commitment to journalism excellence and its dedication to serving the public have earned it a prominent place in the Brazilian media landscape.

O Dia Online controversies

While O Dia Online strives to provide objective and unbiased news, it has faced its share of controversies over the years. One notable controversy was in 2018 when the website published a misleading headline that caused public outrage. The headline misrepresented a politician's statement, leading to widespread criticism and accusations of biased reporting. O Dia Online quickly issued a public apology and retracted the headline, acknowledging the error and reaffirming its commitment to responsible journalism. Since then, the website has implemented stricter editorial standards to avoid similar incidents in the future.