Kem Xôi TV - Viettel Media Youtube channel statistics
Date | Video views | Estimated earnings |
---|---|---|
27.03.2024 Wed | +238,392 | $ 89 - $ 536 |
23.03.2024 Sat | +2,817,959 | $ 1.06K - $ 6.34K |
19.03.2024 Tue | +165,278 | $ 61 - $ 371 |
15.03.2024 Fri | +7,354,646 | $ 2.76K - $ 16.5K |
12.03.2024 Tue | +345,665 | $ 129 - $ 777 |
08.03.2024 Fri | +296,780 | $ 111 - $ 667 |
05.03.2024 Tue | +357,618 | $ 134 - $ 804 |
01.03.2024 Fri | -2,193,477 | $ -822 - $ -4.94K |
27.02.2024 Tue | +318,747 | $ 119 - $ 717 |
24.02.2024 Sat | +187,548 | $ 70 - $ 421 |
21.02.2024 Wed | +364,348 | $ 136 - $ 819 |
11.02.2024 Sun | +195,745 | $ 73 - $ 440 |
07.02.2024 Wed | +9,995 | $ 3 - $ 22 |
02.02.2024 Fri | +353,649 | $ 132 - $ 795 |
Kem Xôi TV - Viettel Media biography
Kem Xôi TV is a Vietnamese YouTube channel owned by Viettel Media. The channel features comedy skits, parodies, and social commentary in a variety of formats. It was created in 2012 and has gained a large following in Vietnam. Kem Xôi TV's content often revolves around everyday life in Vietnam, with a humorous and satirical twist. The channel's videos are known for their witty dialogues, relatable situations, and creative storytelling. Kem Xôi TV has collaborated with several popular Vietnamese YouTubers and celebrities, further expanding its reach and popularity. The channel has become a cultural phenomenon in Vietnam, with many of its catchphrases and skits becoming part of the local vernacular.
Kem Xôi TV - Viettel Media controversies
Kem Xôi TV has had its share of controversies throughout its existence. Some of its videos have been criticized for crossing cultural and social boundaries, which led to backlash from certain groups in Vietnam. The channel often addresses sensitive topics such as politics, gender, and social norms, which can be polarizing. Despite these controversies, Kem Xôi TV has also been praised for its boldness in discussing these issues and initiating conversations among the Vietnamese youth. The channel's creators have acknowledged the controversies and have stated that their intention is to entertain and provoke thought rather than offend. They have been open to dialogue and have made efforts to address criticism in a constructive manner.